Share

The U.S. housing market has experienced a significant shift, with home prices in non-metropolitan (nonmetro) counties increasing at more than double the rate of urban counties since 2019. Based on our experience assessment, this trend is primarily driven by a reversal in migration patterns, as remote work flexibility and a search for affordability have led a growing number of buyers to rural communities, particularly in the Midwest and South. This migration has dramatically elevated prices in previously ultra-affordable markets, creating new challenges for local residents.
The primary driver behind the soaring prices in rural America is a substantial influx of new residents. A working paper from Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies found that net domestic migration turned positive in nonmetro counties for the first time in a decade between 2021 and 2023. During this period, approximately 540,000 people relocated to rural communities, a sharp reversal from the net loss of 78,000 residents in the three years before the pandemic. This migration is largely attributed to the rise of remote work, allowing individuals to prioritize affordability and space over proximity to a physical office.
The most dramatic price increases have been concentrated in budget-friendly states. The following data illustrates the top-performing nonmetro counties from 2019 to 2025, highlighting the scale of appreciation.
| County & State | Median List Price (Nov 2019) | Median List Price (Nov 2025) | Percentage Increase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blackford County, IN | $56,000 | $156,000 | 186% |
| Lauderdale County, TN | $83,000 | $215,000 | 160% |
| Rush County, IN | N/A | N/A | 158% |
| Fountain County, IN | N/A | N/A | 151% |
| Mitchell County, IA | N/A | N/A | 148% |
Blackford County, Indiana, exemplifies this trend. Its median listing price rose a staggering 186%, yet it remains highly affordable at roughly one-third of the U.S. median price of $415,000. This pattern is consistent across other top counties, where significant percentage gains still result in absolute home prices that are far below national benchmarks.
The growth disparity between rural and urban markets is stark. While nonmetro counties saw a collective median listing price increase exceeding 70% over six years, metropolitan counties experienced a rise of just over 30%. This indicates that the most affordable homes in the country are appreciating at a much faster rate than already-expensive urban ones.
Contrary to what some might expect, the surge in prices in these top-performing rural counties is not primarily driven by vacation or second-home buyers. The data shows that none of the top-ranked rural counties have more than 5% of loans tied to nonprimary residences. This signals that the growth is fueled by people seeking primary residences in affordable areas, not by investors or vacationers.
While vacation destinations like Valley County, Idaho (with 62% of loans for nonprimary residences), have also seen strong growth, the analysis confirms that the most explosive appreciation is occurring in "truly rural" counties with low starting price points.
This rapid price escalation presents a significant challenge for local buyers with modest incomes. Data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York indicates that rural workers earn less than 85% of urban workers' earnings. As out-of-area buyers with potentially higher budgets enter the market, they drive up prices, often putting homeownership out of reach for existing residents. Furthermore, rural counties often have a less robust rental market, leaving locals with fewer housing options.
The dramatic rise in rural home prices underscores a fundamental market shift towards affordability. While this presents opportunities for buyers leaving expensive cities, it also creates affordability pressures for local residents. For prospective buyers, thorough research into long-term affordability, including property taxes and commuting costs, is essential before making a move to a rural county.









