Browse
Log in / Register
Share
Descriptive analytics transforms raw recruitment data into actionable insights, helping HR professionals understand past hiring performance to optimize future strategies. By systematically reviewing historical data on time-to-hire, cost-per-hire, and source-of-hire, companies can identify what's working and where bottlenecks exist. This method forms the foundational layer of recruitment analytics, providing a factual basis for improving efficiency and quality of hire without making speculative predictions.
Descriptive analytics is a form of data analysis that interprets historical data to understand changes and patterns that have already occurred within a business function, such as recruitment. Unlike predictive analytics (which forecasts future outcomes) or prescriptive analytics (which suggests actions), it focuses solely on the past. In talent acquisition, this means analyzing completed hiring cycles to answer critical questions about performance. Common metrics analyzed include:
This analysis uses basic mathematical concepts like averages, percentages, and totals to create a clear, factual picture of recruitment health.
Implementing descriptive analytics in your recruitment process involves a structured, five-step approach. This systematic review helps HR teams move from scattered data to coherent insights.
1. Define Key Recruitment Metrics The first step is to decide what you want to measure. Based on your business goals, you might focus on improving hiring speed, reducing costs, or enhancing quality. For example, if your goal is to decrease time-to-fill, your primary metric will be the number of days for each stage of the hiring process. The more specific your metrics, the more accurate your conclusions will be. Measuring time spent in the interview stage separately from the offer stage can provide more precise insights than looking at the total time-to-fill alone.
2. Collect Historical Recruitment Data Once your metrics are defined, identify where the data resides. This information is often spread across your Applicant Tracking System (ATS), HRIS, spreadsheets, and even individual inboxes. Compile data from a significant period—such as the last six months to a year—to ensure you have a robust dataset that accounts for seasonal variations in hiring.
3. Clean and Organize the Information Before analysis, review the compiled data for accuracy and consistency. Remove duplicate entries and ensure fields like application dates and sources are standardized. Organize the information into a structured format, such as a spreadsheet, with clear column headings for each metric (e.g., Job Title, Application Date, Interview Date, Hire Date, Source).
4. Analyze the Data for Patterns With clean data, you can now use analytical tools to identify trends. Pivot tables in spreadsheets are excellent for summarizing data, while data visualization tools can create charts to illustrate patterns clearly. For instance, a bar chart comparing the first-year attrition rate of hires from different sources can vividly show which channels yield the most committed employees. Based on our assessment experience, this visual analysis often reveals unexpected relationships, such as a correlation between a shorter time-to-fill and a higher attrition rate, signaling a potential need to balance speed with thorough candidate assessment.
5. Present Findings to Stakeholders The final step is sharing insights with key decision-makers, such as department heads and senior leadership. Create a visual dashboard with charts and graphs that succinctly communicate the main findings. This allows stakeholders to quickly grasp the state of the recruitment function and make informed decisions about resource allocation, such as investing more in employee referral programs if they prove to be the highest-quality source of hire.
Descriptive analytics moves from theory to practice by solving real-world recruitment challenges. Here are two common scenarios:
Example 1: Optimizing Recruitment Marketing Spend A growing tech company notices its cost-per-hire has increased by 30% over the past year. Using descriptive analytics, the HR team compiles data on all hires from the last four quarters, tagging each by their original application source (e.g., LinkedIn Jobs, Indeed, company career page, employee referral). The analysis reveals that while LinkedIn generates the most applicants, employee referrals yield a 50% higher interview-to-offer ratio and a significantly lower cost-per-hire. The company decides to reallocate a portion of its LinkedIn budget to a formalized employee referral program, thereby improving hiring efficiency.
Example 2: Improving Quality of Hire A retail chain is experiencing high turnover among store managers hired in the last year. The talent acquisition team uses descriptive analytics to compare the performance and retention data of these managers against various factors. They create a simple table to visualize the findings:
| Hiring Source | Avg. 90-Day Performance Rating | First-Year Attrition Rate |
|---|---|---|
| General Job Board A | 3.2 / 5 | 45% |
| Industry-Specific Job Board B | 4.1 / 5 | 20% |
| Internal Promotion | 4.5 / 5 | 5% |
The data clearly shows that internal promotions and hires from niche job boards result in more successful placements. The company then focuses on developing internal talent and building partnerships with specialized industry boards.
Benefits: The primary advantage of descriptive analytics is its ability to turn complex data into a clear, understandable narrative. It provides an evidence-based foundation for recruitment process optimization, helping to justify budgetary decisions and strategic shifts. It is relatively straightforward to implement, as it relies on data that organizations already collect.
Limitations: The main shortcoming is that it only describes what has happened, not why it happened or what will happen next. The insights are backward-looking, and if the historical data is flawed or outdated, the conclusions will be unreliable. Furthermore, without context, there is a risk of bias; for example, a high attrition rate from a specific university might be due to poor onboarding for that cohort, not the quality of the candidates themselves.
To build a truly data-driven recruitment function, start with descriptive analytics to understand your past performance. Use these insights to ask deeper questions that can be explored with predictive and prescriptive models. Focus on cleaning your data, defining clear metrics, and presenting findings visually to drive strategic decisions that enhance your employer brand and secure top talent.
