Share

Remote work can be a legally required religious accommodation for employees observing specific holidays or practices, according to a recent U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) memorandum. This guidance, while issued for federal agencies, serves as a critical reminder for all private employers of their obligations under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Denying such a request based on co-worker resentment does not constitute an undue hardship, but the role's essential functions must be considered.
What does the DOJ memorandum say about religious accommodation and remote work?
The DOJ issued its opinion in response to an inquiry from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency that enforces laws against workplace discrimination. The core finding is that a mandate for employees to return to the workplace does not automatically override the legal duty to provide religious accommodations. In certain situations, allowing situational telework—remote work for a limited, specific purpose—can be an appropriate and legally necessary solution. This is distinct from granting permanent remote work arrangements. The guidance aligns with broader federal directives on religious liberty protections.
What circumstances might warrant telework as a religious accommodation?
The DOJ memo provides clear examples where temporary remote work could be a reasonable accommodation. These typically involve religious observances that conflict with a standard in-office work schedule. For instance, an employee may need to attend religious services during work hours on holidays like Yom Kippur, Good Friday, or Eid al-Fitr. Instead of taking the entire day as paid time off or unpaid leave, working from home allows the employee to be productive for most of the day and then leave for services, thereby minimizing disruption. Based on our assessment experience, each request must be evaluated individually on a case-by-case basis.
What are the limits for employers considering this accommodation?
Employers are not required to grant every request. The primary legal defense for denying a religious accommodation is proving it would cause an undue hardship—a significant difficulty or expense for the business. The DOJ memo clarifies two key points:
| Accommodation Scenario | Likely Reasonable? | Key Consideration |
|---|---|---|
| An accountant requests to work from home on Good Friday to attend afternoon services. | Yes | The core duties (data analysis, reporting) can be performed remotely with secure network access. |
| A receptionist requests to work from home to accommodate daily prayer sessions that require absence from the front desk. | Likely No | The essential function of the role is to be physically present to greet visitors and answer phones. |
| A software developer requests situational telework for a religious holiday. Co-workers complain it's unfair. | Yes | Co-worker resentment, without evidence of operational disruption, does not meet the undue hardship standard. |
How should private employers apply this guidance?
While the DOJ memo was written for federal agencies, attorney Eric Meyer, a founding partner of Peirson Ferdinand, emphasizes that "Private employers should pay attention because Title VII uses the same standards." Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on religion (among other factors) and applies to private employers with 15 or more employees. This means the legal principles in the DOJ memo are directly relevant to the private sector.
What are the key takeaways for handling religious accommodation requests?
This DOJ guidance reinforces established EEOC guidelines for employers. The process requires a good-faith, interactive dialogue with the employee. Key actionable steps include:
Evaluating religious accommodation requests is a delicate balance. By understanding that remote work can be a legally sound solution in specific scenarios, employers can better navigate their obligations, support a diverse workforce, and mitigate legal risk.









